![]() ![]() Jamal Greene is a law professor at Columbia. Some of our decisions may prove controversial and all will spur further debate.īut we speak for all the members of the oversight board when we say that we are committed to demonstrating the value of an independent, principled and transparent oversight process and to serving the online community.Ĭatalina Botero-Marino is a former special rapporteur on freedom of expression of the Organization of the American States. We also know that we will not be able to please everyone. Policymakers, regulators and those who have a stake in the effects of technology on our society all continue to have a critical role to play. ![]() The oversight board cannot, of course, address every concern that people may have with Facebook. All panel decisions will be reviewed by the entire board before they are finalized, and if a majority of members disagree with a decision, they can ask a new panel to hear the case again. Once a case has been chosen, it will be considered by a panel with a rotating set of members. Over the coming months, we will lay out how we prioritize and select cases for review. Cases that examine the line between satire and hate speech, the spread of graphic content after tragic events, and whether manipulated content posted by public figures should be treated differently from other content are just some of those that may come before the board. We will focus on identifying cases that have a real-world impact, are important for public discourse and raise questions about current Facebook policies. We will not be able to offer a ruling on every one of the many thousands of cases that we expect to be shared with us each year. (In the initial phase users will be able to appeal to the board only in cases where Facebook has removed their content, but over the next months we will add the opportunity to review appeals from users who want Facebook to remove content.) Users will be able to appeal to the oversight board if they disagree with Facebook’s initial decision about whether to take down or leave up a given piece of content, and Facebook can also refer cases to the board. We have also worked to create a system that is accessible to people. We will make decisions based on those principles and on the effects on Facebook users and society, without regard to the economic, political or reputational interests of the company. And we are all committed to freedom of expression within the framework of international norms of human rights. But all of us have training and experience that can help the board in considering the most significant content decisions facing online communities. Some of us have been publicly critical of Facebook some of us haven’t. The board members come from different professional, cultural and religious backgrounds and have various political viewpoints. After Facebook selected us, we considered a large number of individuals for the oversight board, including those recommended by the public, before we interviewed and ultimately approved the 16 other members being announced today. Today, the first set of members of the oversight board is being announced. It will make final and binding decisions on whether specific content should be allowed or removed from Facebook and Instagram (which Facebook owns). The oversight board will focus on the most challenging content issues for Facebook, including in areas such as hate speech, harassment, and protecting people’s safety and privacy. Over the past 18 months, more than 2,000 experts and other relevant parties from 88 countries have contributed feedback that has shaped the development of this oversight board, which will have 20 members (ultimately growing to 40) and is scheduled to become operational this year. So in November 2018, recognizing that no company should settle these issues alone, Facebook committed to creating an independent oversight body that will review Facebook’s decisions about what content to take down or leave up. In recent years, the question of what content should stay up or come down on platforms like Facebook, and who should decide this, has become increasingly urgent. Right now, as the world endures a health crisis, social media has become a lifeline for many people, providing valuable information and helping families and communities stay connected.Īt the same time, we know that social media can spread speech that is hateful, harmful and deceitful. Social media affects people’s lives in many ways, good and bad. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |